I believe that is a misuse of the term "open source". Firefox is open source, so is Linux. That means anyone can actually download, view and modify the source files without repercussions. Such action is even encouraged by the original authors.
What you (or for that matter, the author of the article) are referring to is "open" or "free". There is no actual source involved.
New data files for analysis of Wikimedia traffic
-
Today I released two new json files: one file with demographics data from
World Bank, a second file with a subset of the first, augmented with
Wikimedia pa...
Telling knitting from crochet
-
It came as a surprise three years ago when I started crocheting to hear
people call it "knitting". Nobody who crochets or knits confuses the two,
and mos...
2 comments:
I believe that is a misuse of the term "open source". Firefox is open source, so is Linux. That means anyone can actually download, view and modify the source files without repercussions. Such action is even encouraged by the original authors.
What you (or for that matter, the author of the article) are referring to is "open" or "free". There is no actual source involved.
Wikipedia refers to itself as "free-content".
Tycho of Penny Arcade's opinion on Wikipedia
Post a Comment