"Today, as an experiment, we will be turning off new pages creation for
anonymous users in the English Wikipedia." - Jimbo Wales announcement
Sounds like a good plan. Deleting crap pages is much more difficult then
crap content in an otherwise worty artucle. It should be logical then that
to creat crap pages you should go to a little more trouble then with crap
content.
The naivety of some people at Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation is really...
something. Why people cannot read the rules? Or verify their spelling? Oh well.
The fact that a significant proportion of not-created entries is redirects due to
wrong spelling or copyvio is a proof that the restriction was wise. As for the rest,
people are posting their content/sources at this page, so others who decide to register
can actually create them.
🌈 Building Bridges with Edits: The Unfolding Story of LGBT+ Advocacy on
Wikipedia in Nigeria
-
June is globally celebrated as Pride Month, a time to honor the voices,
resilience, and humanity of LGBT+ communities. And for us in Nigeria, it...
5 days ago
1 comment:
To some extent, yes - but I don't think it's too serious. You may want to check my other blog where I elaborate on this further.
Post a Comment